# Difference between revisions of "File:First forgetting curve.jpg"

(uploaded a new version of "File:First forgetting curve.jpg") |
m |
||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

− | + | {{Fig|The first [[Glossary:Forgetting curve|forgetting curve]] for newly learned knowledge collected with [[SuperMemo]]. Power approximation is used in this case due to the heterogeneity of the learning material freshly introduced in the learning process. Lack of separation by [https://supermemo.guru/wiki/Memory_complexity memory complexity] results in superposition of exponential forgetting with different decay constants. On a semi-log graph, the power regression curve is logarithmic (in yellow), and appearing almost straight. The curve shows that in the presented case recall drops merely to 58% in four years, which can be explained by a high reuse of memorized knowledge in real life. The first [[Glossary:Optimum interval|optimum interval]] for review at [[Glossary:Retrievability|retrievability]] of 90% is 3.96 days. The [[Glossary:Forgetting curve|forgetting curve]] can be described with the formula R{{=}}0.9907*power(interval,-0.07), where 0.9907 is the recall after one day, while -0.07 is the decay constant. In this is case, the formula yields 90% recall after 4 days. 80,399 repetition cases were used to plot the presented graph. Steeper drop in recall will occur if the material contains a higher proportion of difficult knowledge (esp. [https://supermemo.guru/wiki/20_rules poorly formulated knowledge]), or in new students with lesser mnemonic skills. Curve irregularity at intervals 15-20 comes from a smaller sample of repetitions (later interval categories on a log scale encompass a wider range of intervals).}} | |

− | |||

− |

## Revision as of 09:59, 3 May 2019

Figure:The first forgetting curve for newly learned knowledge collected with SuperMemo. Power approximation is used in this case due to the heterogeneity of the learning material freshly introduced in the learning process. Lack of separation by memory complexity results in superposition of exponential forgetting with different decay constants. On a semi-log graph, the power regression curve is logarithmic (in yellow), and appearing almost straight. The curve shows that in the presented case recall drops merely to 58% in four years, which can be explained by a high reuse of memorized knowledge in real life. The first optimum interval for review at retrievability of 90% is 3.96 days. The forgetting curve can be described with the formula R=0.9907*power(interval,-0.07), where 0.9907 is the recall after one day, while -0.07 is the decay constant. In this is case, the formula yields 90% recall after 4 days. 80,399 repetition cases were used to plot the presented graph. Steeper drop in recall will occur if the material contains a higher proportion of difficult knowledge (esp. poorly formulated knowledge), or in new students with lesser mnemonic skills. Curve irregularity at intervals 15-20 comes from a smaller sample of repetitions (later interval categories on a log scale encompass a wider range of intervals).

## File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

current | 09:54, 3 May 2019 | 1,352 × 904 (280 KB) | SuperMemoHelp (talk | contribs) | ||

10:06, 11 May 2016 | 1,542 × 866 (265 KB) | SuperMemoHelp (talk | contribs) |

- You cannot overwrite this file.

## File usage

The following 3 pages uses this file: